Airlift USA research report · published 2026-09-03

Calculated U.S. import duties across 55 origins, March–July 2026

Effective duty rates by country of origin and product, computed from 1,197,564 lines of U.S. Census Bureau import statistics covering $1.48 trillion of goods entered for consumption from 55 origins.

$1.48 trillionImports for consumption in the 55-origin sample
$100.7 billionCalculated duty reported by Census on that trade
$6.80Calculated duty per $100 of imports in the sample
59.04%Share of sample import value outside the dutiable base

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. imports for consumption by HS10 commodity and country of origin (CON_VAL_MO, DUT_VAL_MO, CAL_DUT_MO), March–July 2026. Compiled by Airlift USA.

Headline findings

  • The 55-origin sample records $6.80 of calculated duty per $100 of import value. This is $100.7 billion of calculated duty divided by $1.48 trillion of imports for consumption, times 100. It is a value-weighted aggregate for this sample, not an average across importers or a national rate. Calculated duty does not necessarily equal duty paid.
  • 59.04% of sample import value was outside the dutiable base. Dutiable value was 40.96% of total import value. Calculated duty divided by that smaller base gives 16.61%. Neither ratio counts importers or shipments.
  • China-origin imports recorded $22.05 of calculated duty per $100 of import value. China represented 7.45% of sample import value and 24.17% of calculated duty. Its dutiable share was 81.30%. Product mix and applicable provisions both matter; these aggregates do not isolate either effect.
  • Mexico and Canada had lower calculated duty per $100 than the combined sample. The figures were $3.39 and $3.02, respectively, with dutiable shares of 19.07% and 20.29%. This compares each origin's own product mix, not the cost of sourcing an identical product from different countries.
  • Metals accounted for a larger share of calculated duty than of sample import value. HS chapters 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 represented 3.39% of sample import value and 15.17% of calculated duty, or $30.40 per $100 of import value in those chapters.
  • The sample's monthly calculated-duty ratio was lower in July. Calculated duty per $100 of imports was $6.88 for March–June combined and $6.50 for July. This comparison does not isolate the effect of a policy change from changes in import composition.
  • 39 HS headings above $100 million cleared a 40% effective rate — and all but one are metals. The highest was HS 7606 at 56.05% on dutiable value. Only one qualifying heading in the whole dataset sits outside chapters 72 to 76, which shows how narrowly the very high rates are concentrated.

Effective duty by country of origin

Effective rate on dutiable value divides calculated duty by dutiable value. Duty per $100 of imports divides the same numerator by all imports for consumption in the selected group and multiplies by 100. Both are aggregate ratios; neither predicts a particular shipment's duty. Japan and Vietnam illustrate the different denominators: their dutiable shares were 79.48% and 38.59%, with calculated duty of $10.54 and $6.54 per $100 of imports.

Each origin has a different product mix. These comparisons do not hold commodity, preference eligibility or entry circumstances constant.

Duty per $100 of imports, the 20 largest origins by import value, ranked here by duty rate. March–July 2026
$0$6$12$18$24China$22.05Indonesia$14.59Brazil$10.68Japan$10.54Italy$10.02Germany$9.21India$8.24South Korea$8.05Vietnam$6.54United Kingdom$6.36France$5.53Thailand$5.34Switzerland$4.58Malaysia$3.95Belgium$3.58Mexico$3.39Canada$3.02Taiwan$2.31Singapore$1.85Ireland$1.46
Top 20 origins by import value, largest first. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, imports for consumption, March–July 2026. All 55 origins are in the CSV.
OriginImportsDutiable shareEffective rate on dutiable valueDuty per $100 of imports
Mexico$270.8 billion19.07%17.76%$3.39
Canada$175.7 billion20.29%14.86%$3.02
Vietnam$115.9 billion38.59%16.96%$6.54
Taiwan$115.0 billion14.50%15.92%$2.31
China$110.4 billion81.30%27.13%$22.05
South Korea$70.2 billion52.04%15.47%$8.05
Germany$66.6 billion67.46%13.65%$9.21
Japan$62.8 billion79.48%13.27%$10.54
Thailand$62.1 billion32.99%16.20%$5.34
India$42.2 billion51.67%15.95%$8.24
Malaysia$34.6 billion30.49%12.97%$3.95
Italy$32.8 billion71.48%14.01%$10.02
France$29.5 billion44.54%12.41%$5.53
United Kingdom$28.6 billion56.45%11.27%$6.36
Ireland$25.4 billion12.48%11.70%$1.46
Switzerland$21.8 billion34.57%13.26%$4.58
Brazil$15.2 billion66.72%16.01%$10.68
Singapore$14.5 billion19.44%9.52%$1.85
Indonesia$13.4 billion83.05%17.56%$14.59
Belgium$12.1 billion28.97%12.37%$3.58
All 55 origins$1.48 trillion40.96%16.61%$6.80

Monthly calculated-duty ratios

Across the 55 origins, calculated duty per $100 of imports was $6.88 for March–June combined and $6.50 for July. The combined figure uses summed duty and import values, rather than an unweighted average of monthly rates.

Monthly changes can reflect product mix, origin mix and applicable duty provisions. This descriptive dataset does not estimate how much of the change was caused by any one policy. See the dated tariff updates for separate policy context.

Calculated duty per $100 of imports by month, 55 origins in scope
$0$2$4$6$8$6.91March$6.80April$6.96May$6.86June$6.50JulyJuly: final month in this dataset
By month. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, imports for consumption, March–July 2026.
MonthImportsDutiable shareEffective rate on dutiable valueDuty per $100 of imports
March 2026$287.0 billion40.61%17.01%$6.91
April 2026$287.7 billion40.47%16.80%$6.80
May 2026$293.1 billion41.27%16.87%$6.96
June 2026$300.1 billion42.42%16.18%$6.86
July 2026$313.1 billion40.04%16.24%$6.50

Effective duty by HS chapter

Sorted by import value, the table compares calculated duty against total and dutiable value within each chapter. Machinery (84) records $4.10 per $100 of imports; electrical equipment (85), $5.09; vehicles and parts (87), $12.58. Each chapter contains a different mix of products and origins.

These aggregate ratios do not identify the tariff provisions applied to entries or establish why chapters differ. Dutiable shares and calculated-duty rates use different denominators and should be read together. The source does not establish amounts paid by individual importers.

Top 15 HS chapters by import value. Chapters 98 and 99 are U.S. special classification and temporary provisions rather than product chapters and are excluded from this ranking. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, imports for consumption, March–July 2026. Every chapter is in the CSV.
ChapterImportsDutiable shareEffective rate on dutiable valueDuty per $100 of imports
84 Machinery and mechanical appliances$388.9 billion24.26%16.91%$4.10
85 Electrical machinery and equipment$252.6 billion32.50%15.67%$5.09
87 Vehicles other than railway rolling stock$139.1 billion74.62%16.85%$12.58
27 Mineral fuels and oils$82.6 billion34.84%0.18%$0.06
30 Pharmaceutical products$72.9 billion1.60%9.84%$0.16
90 Optical, medical and precision instruments$47.9 billion54.07%11.96%$6.47
39 Plastics and articles thereof$29.7 billion66.16%15.58%$10.30
71 Pearls, precious stones, precious metals$25.6 billion18.05%14.13%$2.55
94 Furniture, bedding and lighting$23.8 billion68.94%19.34%$13.33
88 Aircraft, spacecraft and parts$16.7 billion6.21%12.95%$0.80
73 Articles of iron or steel$15.3 billion91.88%43.70%$40.15
29 Organic chemicals$14.8 billion58.78%10.86%$6.38
61 Apparel, knitted or crocheted$14.3 billion84.54%28.04%$23.71
40 Rubber and articles thereof$13.6 billion70.24%18.97%$13.32
76 Aluminium and articles thereof$13.2 billion83.84%47.89%$40.15

Where effective rates exceeded 40%

This table includes 39 headings with at least $100 million of sample import value and calculated duty above 40% of dutiable value. The filters describe this historical sample; they do not identify which tariff programmes caused the ratios or predict an individual shipment's charge.

HS4 headings with at least $100 million of imports and an effective rate above 40%. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, imports for consumption, March–July 2026.
HeadingImportsDutiable shareEffective rate on dutiable valueDuty per $100 of imports
7606 Aluminum plates, sheets and strip, of a thickness exceeding 0.2 mm $3.01 billion98.35%56.05%$55.12
7317 Nails, tacks, drawing pins, corrugated nails, staples (other than those of heading 8305) and similar articles, of iron or steel, whether or not with heads of other material, but excluding such articles with heads of copper $206 million98.21%53.52%$52.57
7607 Aluminum foil (whether or not printed, or backed with paper, paperboard, plastics or similar backing materials) of a thickness (excluding any backing) not exceeding 0.2 mm $573 million98.03%52.46%$51.42
7315 Chain and parts thereof, of iron or steel $224 million99%52.44%$51.92
7318 Screws, bolts, nuts, coach screws, screw hooks, rivets, cotters, cotter pins, washers (including spring washers) and similar articles, of iron or steel $2.35 billion96.43%52.33%$50.46
7412 Copper tube or pipe fittings (for example couplings, elbows, sleeves) $404 million96.86%51.83%$50.21
7407 Copper bars, rods and profiles $292 million91.93%51.67%$47.50
7419 Other articles of copper $147 million95.53%51.56%$49.26
7604 Aluminum bars, rods and profiles $515 million92.94%51.13%$47.52
7614 Stranded wire, cables, plaited bands and the like, including slings and similar articles, of aluminum, not electrically insulated $154 million98.05%51.09%$50.10
7310 Tanks, casks, drums, cans, boxes and similar containers, for any material (other than compressed or liquefied gas), of iron or steel, of a capacity not exceeding 300 liters, whether or not lined or heat insulated, but not fitted with mechanical or thermal equipment $137 million84.46%50.83%$42.93
7408 Copper wire $273 million55.75%50.54%$28.18
7411 Copper tubes and pipes $444 million95.17%50.41%$47.98
7326 Other articles of iron or steel $2.11 billion91.44%50.21%$45.91
7307 Tube or pipe fittings (for example, couplings, elbows, sleeves), of iron or steel $1.28 billion96.33%50.15%$48.31
7409 Copper plates, sheets and strip, of a thickness exceeding 0.15 mm $378 million78.02%49.89%$38.92
7314 Cloth (including endless bands), grill, netting and fencing, of iron or steel wire; expanded metal of iron or steel $188 million93.27%49.52%$46.19
7210 Flat-rolled products of iron or nonalloy steel, of a width of 600 mm or more, clad, plated or coated $1.13 billion97.52%49.50%$48.27
7222 Other bars and rods of stainless steel; angles, shapes and sections of stainless steel $216 million94.99%48.94%$46.49
7312 Stranded wire, ropes, cables, plaited bands, slings and the like, of iron or steel, not electrically insulated $317 million94.52%48.90%$46.23
7228 Other bars and rods of other alloy steel; angles, shapes and sections, of other alloy steel; hollow drill bars and rods, of alloy or nonalloy steel $168 million97.33%48.78%$47.48
7227 Bars and rods, hot-rolled, in irregularly wound coils, of other alloy steel $142 million99.73%48.66%$48.53
7605 Aluminum wire $442 million98.03%48.32%$47.37
7217 Wire of iron or nonalloy steel $155 million97.32%48.21%$46.91
7306 Other tubes, pipes and hollow profiles (for example, open seamed or welded, riveted or similarly closed), of iron or steel $1.34 billion93.41%48.11%$44.94
7304 Tubes, pipes and hollow profiles, seamless, of iron (other than cast iron) or steel $687 million97.65%47.93%$46.80
7214 Other bars and rods of iron or nonalloy steel, not further worked than forged, hot-rolled, hot-drawn or hot-extruded, but including those twisted after rolling $312 million99.82%47.81%$47.72
7601 Unwrought aluminum $4.27 billion98.46%46.61%$45.89
7208 Flat-rolled products of iron or nonalloy steel, of a width of 600 mm or more, hot-rolled, not clad, plated or coated $402 million98.89%46.07%$45.56
7616 Other articles of aluminum $830 million90.38%46.05%$41.62
7225 Flat-rolled products of other alloy steel, of a width of 600 mm or more $412 million98.65%45.64%$45.03
7320 Springs and leaves for springs, of iron or steel $502 million47.09%44.92%$21.15
7219 Flat-rolled products of stainless steel, of a width of 600 mm or more $332 million97.53%44.91%$43.80
7209 Flat-rolled products of iron or nonalloy steel, of a width of 600 mm or more, cold-rolled (cold-reduced), not clad, plated or coated $241 million98.44%44.68%$43.99
3818 Chemical elements doped for use in electronics, in the form of discs, wafers or similar forms; chemical compounds doped for use in electronics $828 million2.36%43.62%$1.03
7612 Aluminum casks, drums, cans, boxes and similar containers (including rigid or collapsible tubular containers), for any material (other than compressed or liquefied gas), of a capacity not exceeding 300 liters, whether or not lined or heat insulated, but not fitted with mechanical or thermal equipment $137 million86.72%42.66%$37.00
7311 Containers for compressed or liquefied gas, of iron or steel $171 million88.18%42.33%$37.33
7410 Copper foil (whether or not printed or backed with paper, paperboard, plastics or similar backing materials) of a thickness (excluding any backing) not exceeding 0.15 mm $269 million97.31%41.14%$40.03
7325 Other cast articles of iron or steel $169 million88.78%40.79%$36.21

Methodology

Source. Every figure comes from the U.S. Census Bureau's international trade API, https://api.census.gov/data/timeseries/intltrade/imports/hs, series CON_VAL_MO, DUT_VAL_MO, CAL_DUT_MO, at HS10 commodity level by country of origin. We read 1,197,564 commodity-country-month rows across 275 API responses. Census data is a work of the U.S. federal government and is in the public domain; this report and the CSVs below may be reproduced with attribution.

Definitions.Imports is customs value of imports for consumption (CON_VAL_MO): goods entered into U.S. commerce, which is the correct base for duty questions. Dutiable value (DUT_VAL_MO) is generally the customs value subject to duty; calculated duty (CAL_DUT_MO) is the Census estimate of calculated duty. Dutiable share is dutiable value over customs value. Effective rate on dutiable value is calculated duty over dutiable value. Duty per $100 of imports is calculated duty over customs value, times 100.

How to interpret the ratios. Summing calculated duty before dividing by the summed value weights observations by their relevant value base. A simple average of origin rates would answer a different question. The data contains commodity-origin-month aggregates, not individual importer bills. Neither ratio is a measure of a typical importer or a specific shipment. Both appear in every table.

Calculated versus paid. Census cautions that calculated-duty estimates may differ from amounts actually paid and can be overstated or understated in some cases. See the Census definitions of calculated duty and dutiable value.

Scope. 55 countries of origin — the largest U.S. trading partners plus the sourcing markets our customers ask about most — accounting for $1.48 trillion of imports for consumption over the five months. This is not total U.S. imports, and ratios here should not be quoted as national figures. Chapters 98 and 99 are special classification and temporary provisions rather than product chapters; they sit inside the totals but are held out of the chapter ranking.

What is excluded. Antidumping and countervailing duties, the merchandise processing fee, the harbor maintenance fee, excise taxes and quota provisions are not in CAL_DUT_MO and are therefore not in any figure here. Real landed cost is higher than these rates. Duty drawback, post-summary corrections and protest refunds are also outside the series, so figures for recent months can be revised.

Reporting lag. Census publishes monthly import statistics roughly six weeks after the month closes, and revises them. July 2026 is the most recent month available as of 2026-09-03. Any policy change after 31 July 2026 is outside this dataset.

Cross-check against our tariff engine. We scored the same trade with the duty engine behind our tariff simulator, which computes a rate from the Harmonized Tariff Schedule and the Chapter 99 additional-duty provisions rather than from Census aggregates. On the $1.15 trillion of trade it could score, its computed rate matched the rate implied by the Census figures on 87% of value (72.5% of individual commodity-origin-month cells). It declined to score 6,119 cells — mainly specific (per-unit) duty rates, cells with mixed USMCA qualification, and codes with no matching HTS record. The remaining 13% of disagreement is concentrated in product-specific exemption annexes published as legal notes rather than as data.

Download the data

Four CSVs, one per table, each with a source line as the first row. Columns carry raw dollar amounts as well as the three derived ratios, so nothing has to be recomputed from rounded percentages.

Cite this report

Wording corrected 2026-09-07: sample scope and calculated-duty definitions clarified. Source period and original publication date are shown separately.

Airlift USA Inc. “Calculated U.S. import duties across 55 origins, March–July 2026.” 2026-09-03. https://airliftusa.com/research/effective-us-tariff-rates-2026

Canonical URL: https://airliftusa.com/research/effective-us-tariff-rates-2026. The report and the CSVs are derived from public-domain U.S. Census Bureau statistics and may be reproduced or charted with attribution to Airlift USA and the U.S. Census Bureau.

Press contact. Airlift USA Inc, 2629 Townsgate Road, Suite 150, Westlake Village, CA 91361 — contact@airliftusa.com, +1-732-227-4256. We can walk a reporter through the extract, the definitions, or a specific HS code on request.